rewire.it
Paper-reported evidence

The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods

2026 · Peer-reviewed · PMC13292216.1

Paper-reported results. The values below come from this source, not an independent rewire.it run.

Open primary paper →DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01457

Primary full text via Europe PMC XML; venue: Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling; PMC ID: PMC13292216.

2 verified numerical rows · source checked 2026-09-15

Paper-reportedIndependent paper evaluation

Chai-1

Lipid–protein binding pose

Reported score
60.7%95% CI 55.2–66.0
Metric
Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å
Dataset / split
LiPP lipid–protein complexes 331 complexes

Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å.

Table 2, Chai-1 row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate columnVerify at source →
Paper-reportedIndependent paper evaluation

DiffDock-L

Lipid–protein binding pose

Reported score
46.8%95% CI 41.3–52.3
Metric
Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å
Dataset / split
LiPP lipid–protein complexes 331 complexes

Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å.

Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate columnVerify at source →